Skip to main content

Author: Esteban Romero-Frías

currently works as Vice-Rector for Social Innovation, Employability and Entrepreneurship at the University of Granada and is Full Professor in the Department of Accountancy and Finance. His academic and research work focuses on public and social innovation, digital learning, and digital humanities. Through UGR MediaLab, which he has directed since its foundation, he has led various collaborative projects such as Impronta Granada and UnInPública that are aimed at building bridges between universities, public institutions, and society to tackle regional challenges.

Quadruple Helix Stakeholders Format / Living Labs

Case Study of the Second Impronta Granada Meeting and Poniente Workshop

Description

The Quadruple Helix (QH) model fosters collaboration between four key stakeholders: academia, government, industry, and civil society. The Living Lab methodology allows these groups to cocreate solutions in real-world settings.

UGR County Councils refers to the initiative led by the University of Granada (UGR) under the Erasmus+ ENGAGEgreen project, aiming to foster collaboration between academic researchers, local governments, and community stakeholders. This initiative focuses on addressing regional challenges through cocreated, research-driven solutions. The Second Impronta Granada Meeting is the third pilot event organized by UGR as part of this project, bringing together researchers, policymakers, and local communities to discuss and develop strategies for sustainable development in rural and urban areas

The Poniente Workshop, part of the Second Impronta Granada meeting, serves as a case study of how these two frameworks work together to address regional challenges in the Poniente Granadino region. The event brought together policymakers, academics, local businesses, and citizens working together to identify shared needs, propose solutions, and codesign initiatives for the region’s sustainable development.

In the run-up to the workshop, two online meetings with the UGR County Councils from the Poniente region and other areas were held to identify the key themes that would be presented at the meeting. These discussions helped shape the agenda and guided the workshop’s focus on sustainable development, regional identity, and regional collaboration.

 

 

Summary: Key features in a nutshell

  • Stakeholders involved: University of Granada (UGR), local governments (Diputación de Granada, municipalities), local businesses, civil society organizations, and citizens
  • Objective: To identify common challenges and to cocreate actionable solutions for regional problems related to depopulation, local heritage, tourism, and economic development
  • Format: An interactive workshop, with cocreation activities, and panel discussions, building on findings from two preparatory online meetings
  • Outcome: Development of practical initiatives such as intergenerational housing, tourism revitalization, integration of local knowledge, and cultural heritage preservation

 

How does the format work?

The Poniente Workshop followed the Quadruple Helix (QH) model, with active participation from governmental actors, academia, local businesses, and civil society

  1. Government: Local councils and the Diputación de Granada provided policy frameworks, funding, and regional development goals.
  2. Academia: Experts from the University of Granada (UGR) shared research findings on cultural heritage, socioeconomic development, and sustainable tourism.
  3. Civil Society: Organizations like Tierra de Aguas and local communities represented the needs of the population and their vision for the future of the Poniente region.
  4. Local Businesses: Entrepreneurs discussed how to connect local products and services to sustainable tourism models and the economic revitalization of the area.

 

Challenges

  • Coordination Complexity: Despite efforts, coordination between stakeholders remains a challenge due to the complexity of local governance structures, funding dynamics, and the differing goals of each actor
  • Sustainability: The main challenge lies in maintaining long-term commitment to initiatives as most projects are funded on a short-term basis and lack a continuous funding strategy
  • Stakeholder Engagement: The need to engage local businesses and the broader community remains difficult, especially in marginalized areas or regions where public participation is low

 

Tasks and resources

Scientists

  • Tasks
    • Contributing research insights on socioeconomic development, cultural heritage, and sustainable tourism; providing evidence for policymaking
  • Required resources
    • Time for fieldwork and data collection
    • Collaboration with local governments to align research with practical solutions
    • Support for disseminating research findings to local stakeholders

Knowledge exchange managers and research managers

  • Tasks
    • Organizing stakeholder meetings
    • Disseminating research findings
    • Ensuring communication between academia, government, and civil society
  • Required resources
    • Digital platforms (e.g., webinars, forums) to facilitate communication
    • Organizational resources for managing the events and sustaining long-term initiatives

Policymakers

  • Tasks
    • Defining regional policy frameworks
    • Providing financial support for local initiatives
    • Ensuring alignment with local and EU development goals
  • Required resources
    • Policy expertise and administrative capacity for effective project management
    • Financial support and allocation of resources to ongoing initiatives
    • Time to participate in meetings, workshops, and planning sessions

 

Examples

  1. Living Lab Example:The Poniente Workshop served as a Living Lab where stakeholders codesigned solutions for regional development; projects such as intergenerational housing models and sustainable tourism programs were suggested based on real-world challenges presented during the workshop
  2. Research-based example
  • Research conducted by the University of Granada (UGR) on cultural heritage preservation informed the creation of strategies for preserving the region’s history while simultaneously boosting local economies
  • Academic contributions, such as sociodemographic studies on depopulation, provided the foundation for formulating strategies that directly addressed the region’s challenges.

 

Sources and further reading

Official coverage of the Second Impronta Granada meeting – University and Territory event: https://improntagranada.es/impronta/ii-impronta-granada-meeting-strengthens-the-university-territory-alliance-in-loja/

Case Study Details

How is the Format Conducted?

  • The Poniente Workshop followed a structured format of an interactive session with micropresentations, group work, and panel discussions; prior to the event, two preparatory online meetings helped define key themes, such as sustainable tourism, youth retention, and economic revitalization, which were then discussed in greater depth during the event

Available Resources (Main Tasks)

  • Coordination between local councils, researchers, and civil society is key to ensuring sustainability and relevance of the projects
  • Research dissemination through the University of Granada (UGR) to share key findings with all stakeholders and design solutions that align with regional needs

What works? What doesn’t? (Lessons learnt)

  • What works: The QH model of collaboration was effective in fostering dialogue and co-creation among diverse stakeholders; bringing together a variety of stakeholders with shared interests can lead to effective co-creation of solutions. The Living Lab approach allows for real-time feedback
  • What doesn’t work: Coordination remains a challenge, and stakeholder engagement continues to be difficult, especially with local businesses and marginalized groups; besides, ensuring sustainability and long-term engagement from stakeholders is challenging, particularly when there are limited resources

 

How are the activities evaluated?

  • Evaluating the success of the Living Lab requires monitoring stakeholder engagement and the implementation of solutions post-workshop
  • Feedback will be gathered through surveys and follow-up workshops to assess the long-term impact of the initiatives launched

 

Do you want to know more about the policy engagement toolkit?

Do you want to share your experience in policy engagement? Do you think about contributing to the policy engagement toolkit? Feel free to contact Tome Sandevski via science-policy@uni-frankfurt.de

UGR County Councils: Designing the Roadmap

Description – Key features in a nutshell

The UGR County Councils are regional dialogue spaces that connect university staff, local policymakers, civil society actors, and the private sector across Granada’s regions. They foster collaboration to identify local challenges and co-design solutions. Their aim is to align scientific knowledge with regional development needs. They are organised primarily around in-person meetings, while virtual sessions are also held to follow up on the activities of each UGR County Council. The UGR County Councils are new collaborative spaces designed:

  • To foster direct connections between the University of Granada (UGR) and the different municipalities and regions within the province of Granada
  • To create innovative, sustainable solutions by engaging the university, local governments, businesses, and the public in co-creation processes
  • To generate opportunities and transfer scientific, educational, and innovative knowledge that contribute to the transformation and sustainable development of the regions
  • To lay the foundations for future Living Labs, testing and applying innovations in public policies and local practices

 

How does the format work?

The methodology behind the UGR County Councils is based on the Living Lab methodology and follows a collaborative model known as the ‘Quadruple Helix’, bringing together four key stakeholders: the university, the public sector (municipalities’ mayors and governments), businesses, and citizens. The UGR County Councils aim to work closely with local communities to identify local needs related to three main thematic areas: the environmental impact of urban agendas, soil and culture. Besides, one of the UGR County Councils’ objectives is to design solutions for local development through regular meetings, workshops, and hackathons which can be implemented through scientific knowledge, technological innovation, and public policies.

After recruiting our main participants (lecturers, researchers, professors, and technicians from the University of Granada) via Google Form, the first informational meeting about the formation of UGR County Councils was held on 18 December 2024, gathering over 45 participants. The formal launch of the UGR County Councils took place and premiered on 20 January, 2025, as part of the Impronta Granada initiative, the strategic alliance between the University of Granada and the Provincial Council of Granada.

This recruitment process was coordinated by Medialab UGR, the Social Innovation Lab of the University of Granada. The first internal call was launched through a Google Form open to the entire university community between June and July 2024. Once this initial group was engaged, we organised the first informational and training session on the Living Lab methodology on 18 December 2024.

After ensuring that the university community was familiar with the initiative, we updated the Google Form to open participation to the other three helices – citizens, policymakers, and the business sector. University members themselves helped share the form with representatives from their own municipalities. Parallel to this, Medialab UGR, with the support of the Provincial Council of Granada, also sent the form to all municipalities in the province of Granada.

 

Challenges

  • Engagement of local stakeholders. Ensuring active and sustained participation from local businesses, municipalities, and citizens is challenging
  • Coordinating diverse interests. Balancing the interests of different groups (university, public sector, businesses, and citizens) while ensuring the project’s goals are met
  • Implementation of solutions. Ensuring the co-created solutions are practical and implementable within the local context and effectively integrated into local policies

 

Tasks and resources

Scientists

Over 80 scientists from the University of Granada have joined the UGR County Council initiative. The registered researchers have different backgrounds and are specialised in more than 20 diverse areas of expertise (ranging from psychology and linguistics to parasitology and ecology), which make the knowledge transfer rich and fruitful.

Key tasks

  • Provide scientific expertise and knowledge to help identify local needs and co-create innovative solutions
  • Guide collaborative research projects that address regional challenges, particularly within the framework of the “Living Lab” methodology
  • Actively participate in the evaluation of proposed solutions and innovations based on scientific validity and local applicability
  • Present findings from collaborative efforts at various meetings, workshops, and events, such as the Impronta Granada annual gathering

 

Knowledge exchange managers and research managers

Key tasks

  • Coordination of knowledge transfer by facilitating the transfer of scientific knowledge to local communities
  • Ensure active participation from all relevant stakeholders, including municipalities, businesses, and citizens and ensure their needs are met with appropriate knowledge inputs
  • Handle logistical arrangements for meetings, workshops, and events, ensuring smooth operations and communication
  • Oversee the implementation of collaborative projects between UGR, businesses, and local governments
  • Promote participation in the councils through communication strategies such as the social media campaigns
  • Collect participant feedback after each session, ensuring that ideas and concerns are communicated effectively to the relevant decision makers


Policymakers

Key tasks

  • Contribute to the identification of local needs, leveraging their expertise to align council projects with existing urban agendas and municipal and regional development plans
  • Help ensure that the innovative solutions developed through the UGR County Councils are integrated into local governance and policymaking processes.
  • Provide institutional support for the projects that emerge from the UGR County Councils
  • Engage with local businesses, citizens, and researchers to promote regional collaborations and policy initiatives based on scientific evidence.

 

Example

The successful implementation of the Living Lab methodology in the 10 different regions constituting the Granada province, where university researchers and local stakeholders work together to design and implement solutions for their municipalities’ needs.

 

How has the format been implemented?

  1. Initial informational session. Held on 18 December 2024, organised by Medialab UGR within the framework of the Impronta Granada initiative, with institutional support from the Vice-Rectorate for Social Innovation, Employability and Entrepreneurship. The meeting was moderated by Medialab UGR staff, who were also responsible for designing and managing the agenda, and brought together 46 participants to discuss the structure, objectives, and methodology behind the creation of the UGR County Councils.
  2. Internal structure
    1. Council presidency. Vice-Rectorate for Social Innovation, Employability, and Entrepreneurship.
    2. Council spokesperson. Responsible for leading meetings, ensuring cohesion among stakeholders, and coordinating action implementation. This role could be assumed by a UGR lecturer or staff member.
    3. Dialogue facilitator. When necessary, Medialab UGR experts will facilitate participatory processes, ensuring all actors have a voice and that discussions are productive and balanced.
  3. Ongoing Google Form questionnaire. The initial Google Form used to reach the lecturers, professors, researchers, and technicians from the University of Granada has been extended to the other three stakeholders (municipalities’ governments, private sector and citizenship in the region of Granada) accounting currently for over 120 registered participants.
  4. Emailing list. Creation of an emailing list per UGR County Council so that the different participants can contact each other.
  5. Organisational session. 10 different virtual meetings have been organised so that every UGR County Council participant can meet their counterparts and identify their local needs so as to present them in the formal launch event.
  6. Formal launch. The councils met officially on 20 January 2025 during the Impronta Granada event, where all participants were introduced and roles assigned.
  7. Additional meetings. Subsequent meetings will be held either in-person or online, depending on local needs and priorities.

 

Available resources (What are the main tasks?)

  1. Coordination: Organising meetings, gathering feedback, and ensuring all stakeholders are informed of developments.
  2. Workshops and Living Labs: Facilitating collaborative problem-solving and ideation sessions.
  3. Community engagement: Ensuring active participation from local residents, businesses, and governmental bodies. Fostering engagement is considered in the following ways:
    1. Participation certificates;
    2. Continuous training through science-policy based workshops;
    3. Best UGR County Council Award to be delivered at the 2026 Impronta Granada event;
    4. Visibility and dissemination through UGR social media.

 

What works? What doesn`t? (Lessons learnt)

  • What works? Clear communication channels and flexible participation options (online and in-person meetings) have helped engage stakeholders
  • What doesn’t? Overreliance on digital platforms for engagement may exclude some community members, especially in rural areas with limited access to technology.

 

How do you evaluate the activities?

Evaluation will be conducted through continuous feedback loops, including focus groups after each meeting. Success indicators include:

  • Number of projects initiated
  • Level of satisfaction from participants
  • Number of solutions implemented in local policies
  • Degree of local economic impact

 

Sources and further reading

Promotion and dissemination of both the informational meeting and the consolidation of the UGR County Councils:

 

Do you want to know more about the policy engagement toolkit?

Do you want to share your experience in policy engagement? Do you think about contributing to the policy engagement toolkit? Feel free to contact Tome Sandevski via science-policy@uni-frankfurt.de

How to Plan Follow-Up Activities

A Case Study of the Second Impronta Granada Meeting and Entrepreneurship and Employability Workshop

Description

UGR County Councils refers to the initiative led by the University of Granada (UGR) under the Erasmus+ ENGAGEgreen project, which aims to foster collaboration between academic researchers, local governments, and community stakeholders. This initiative focuses on addressing regional challenges through cocreated, research-driven solutions. The Second Impronta Granada Meeting is the third pilot event organized by UGR as part of this project, bringing together researchers, policymakers, and local communities to discuss and develop strategies for sustainable development in rural and urban areas.

Planning effective follow-up activities is essential to ensuring that the momentum generated by participatory events like the Entrepreneurship and Employability Workshop that took place at the Second Impronta Granada Meeting is sustained and transformed into long-term, actionable outcomes. The UGR County Councils initiative, along with the Second Impronta Granada Meeting, demonstrates how follow-up activities can provide continuous engagement between researchers, local governments, and youth participants to address employment and entrepreneurship challenges in rural regions. Follow-up actions help evaluate the success of proposed solutions and allow for adjustments as the community works together to overcome challenges and build sustainable initiatives.

 

Summary: Key features in a nutshell

  • Objective: To design and implement follow-up activities that maintain engagement with local stakeholders and ensure sustainability in addressing employment and entrepreneurship issues
  • Approach:
    • Post-event surveys to evaluate the effectiveness of proposals
    • Ongoing collaboration between UGR researchers, policymakers, and local businesses
    • Visibility of outcomes through digital platforms like the Impronta Granada website
  • Outcome: Creation of long-term initiatives that reflect collaborative solutions and tackle local development challenges

 

How does the format work?

  1. Planning post-event engagement: After the  Entrepreneurship and Employability Workshop, the follow-up phase ensures that all stakeholders stay engaged. This can be achieved through feedback loops like surveys and online discussions on platforms such as the Impronta Granada website. Feedback helps refine the solutions discussed during the event and provides participants an opportunity to reflect on the progress made.
  2. Collecting feedback and evaluating impact: Post-event surveys and interviews can be used to measure the effectiveness of the proposed solutions. These tools help identify gaps in implementation and areas that require additional attention. For instance, participants could be asked if the entrepreneurship programs presented in the workshop were accessible and if they helped overcome barriers to starting businesses in rural areas.
  3. Visibility and continuous engagement: Using digital platforms like the Impronta Granada website, researchers and policymakers can continue the dialogue after the event by updating project progress and sharing outcomes. This transparency keeps the community informed and ensures that everyone is working towards common goals.
  4. Sustaining collaboration: Long-term engagement requires regular communication. After the II Encuentro Impronta Granada, stakeholders can continue collaborating through follow-up workshops, networking events, or virtual consultations, where ideas and solutions can be refined using feedback from the initial event.

 

Challenges

  • Sustaining participation: Keeping stakeholders engaged long-term can be difficult due to time constraints, especially for researchers and policymakers who have other responsibilities
  • Resource availability: Limited funding and resources can make consistent implementation of follow-up activities challenging
  • Managing expectations: Ensuring that stakeholders’ expectations align with what can be realistically achieved in the follow-up phase is crucial to avoiding disillusionment

 

Tasks and resources

Scientists

  • Tasks
    • Support data collection
    • Participate in follow-up workshops
    • Share updates on research progress
  • Required resources
    • Time for research dissemination and follow-up consultations

Knowledge exchange managers and research managers

  • Tasks
    • Coordinate online feedback.
    • Manage communication platforms
    • Facilitate follow-up events
  • Required resources
    • Digital tools (e.g., websites, survey tools)

Policymakers

  • Tasks
    • Monitor progress.
    • Allocate resources
    • Ensure that research findings are integrated into policy decisions
  • Required resources
    • Financial and administrative support for post-event actions

 

Examples

  1. Impronta Granada website: The Impronta Granada website allowed continuous engagement after the  Entrepreneurship and Employability Workshop where researchers shared updates, progress reports, and new insights, allowing policymakers and businesses could stay informed and involved.
  2. Follow-up surveys: After the Second Encuentro Impronta Granada, surveys were used to assess the effectiveness of entrepreneurship programs and youth employment initiatives discussed during the event, with feedback used to refine the proposals and ensure that they met local needs.

 

Sources and further reading


Case study details:

How is the format implemented?

Follow-up activities are initiated post-dialogue events to ensure the connection between researchers and policymakers is maintained. For example, after the Second Impronta Granada Meeting, researchers were invited to submit further proposals for collaboration based on the feedback received from policymakers and stakeholders. This ensured that both parties could review and refine their engagements.

Available resources (main tasks):

  • Collecting feedback from participants to assess the relevance of research presentations
  • Facilitating ongoing dialogue via online platforms like Impronta Granada to track progress
  • Organizing further collaborative meetings based on the discussions at the events

 

What works? What doesn’t? (Lessons Learnt):

What works:

Using structured online platforms such as Impronta Granada to continue discussions beyond events ensures that the momentum of the workshops and discussions is not lost.

What doesn’t work:

It’s challenging to maintain sustained participation by policymakers after the events due to their varying commitments and workloads.

How are the activities evaluated?

The follow-up activities were evaluated using feedback surveys sent to both researchers and policymakers, to gauge how well the research had impacted local policymaking. Follow-up surveys assessed the continuation of collaboration, the implementation of knowledge, and the development of new projects or initiatives inspired by the initial discussions.

 

Do you want to know more about the policy engagement toolkit?

Do you want to share your experience in policy engagement? Do you think about contributing to the policy engagement toolkit? Feel free to contact Tome Sandevski via science-policy@pvw.uni-frankfurt.de

How to Organise Dialogue Events in regional Capitals

Case Study of the Second Impronta Granada Meeting and Entrepreneurship and Employability Workshop

Description

Organizing dialogue events in capitals or key urban areas requires a structured approach that balances the needs of local stakeholders with the goals of policymakers. These events provide a platform for researchers, businesses, and policymakers to co-create solutions for pressing territorial challenges, ensuring that the voice of the community is heard and considered. This contribution discusses strategies for organizing dialogue events in urban centers and leveraging them to foster inclusive policymaking in the context of entrepreneurship and youth employment.

 

Summary: Key Features in a Nutshell:

  • Objective: To create an effective structure for dialogue events that connect local stakeholders with policymakers to co-create sustainable solutions for employment and entrepreneurship.
  • Approach:
    • Clear goals for the event to align academic research with policy priorities.
    • Multi-stakeholder workshops to foster collaborative solutions.
    • Use of interactive tools (e.g., micropresentations, polling, feedback sessions) to ensure active participation.
  • Outcome: A transparent and inclusive process where local challenges are addressed through policy-driven solutions that are informed by academic research and local expertise.

 

How Does the Format Work?

  1. Setting Clear Objectives: Before the event, it is essential to define the goals and outcomes expected from the dialogue event. For the Entrepreneurship and Employability Workshop, the goal was to address youth unemployment and promote entrepreneurship in the Poniente Granadino region by involving UGR researchers, local businesses, and policymakers.
  2. Interactive Sessions and Workshops: During the event, interactive workshops and micropresentations were organized to encourage real-time feedback. Researchers shared data and insights, while policymakers discussed policy frameworks and how these could be integrated with academic findings to create actionable strategies.
  3. Engagement with Local and National Stakeholders: It is important to include both local actors and national policymakers in the discussion. The Entrepreneurship and Employability Workshop in Granada connected local youth and policymakers with national representatives, ensuring that the solutions developed were relevant and feasible at both levels.
  4. Post-Event Engagement: Ensuring that the event leads to sustained collaboration is key. Follow-up activities, including workshops and feedback surveys, should be planned to ensure that policymakers and researchers continue to collaborate after the event.

Challenges:

  • Managing Expectations: Different stakeholders have different expectations. Policymakers may focus on policy alignment while researchers may prioritize data accuracy. Balancing these priorities requires careful facilitation.
  • Sustaining Momentum: Keeping the engagement high after the initial dialogue event requires consistent follow-up, which may be hindered by time constraints or budget limitations.

Tasks and Resources:

Scientists

  • Tasks:
    • Present research findings relevant to youth employment and entrepreneurship.
    • Provide data-driven solutions for local development challenges.
    • Engage in workshops and policy discussions.
  • Required Resources:
    • Time for research dissemination and participation in events.
    • Communication tools for presenting research data and engaging with stakeholders.

Knowledge exchange managers and research managers

  • Tasks
    • Facilitate interactive workshops and ensure researcher-policymaker interaction.
    • Organize feedback loops and ensure ongoing communication post-event.
  • Required Resources:
    • Digital platforms for research dissemination and ongoing feedback.
    • Logistical support for organizing sessions and ensuring active participation.

Policymakers

  • Tasks:
    • Integrate research findings into local policies and allocate resources to support research-driven initiatives.
    • Ensure long-term collaboration between researchers and local communities.
  • Required Resources:
    • Policy expertise to interpret research data and incorporate it into decision-making.
    • Financial resources for post-event actions and implementation.

 

Examples

UGR County Councils refers to the initiative led by the University of Granada (UGR) under the ENGAGEgreen project, aiming to foster collaboration between academic researchers, local governments, and community stakeholders. This initiative focuses on addressing territorial challenges through co-created, research-driven solutions. The Second Impronta Granada Meeting is the third pilot event organized by UGR as part of this project, bringing together researchers, policymakers, and local communities to discuss and develop strategies for sustainable development in rural and urban areas.

The Entrepreneurship and Employability Workshop, which took place at the Second Impronta Granada meeting, successfully organized multi-stakeholder dialogues in an urban setting, enabling researchers, policymakers, and youth participants to collaborate in addressing employment and entrepreneurship challenges. The event’s interactive workshops helped align research with local policy, paving the way for further collaboration.

Sources and Further Reading

 

Case Study Details

How is the Format Conducted

Dialogue events in capitals, such as the Second Impronta Granada Meeting in Loja, combine workshops, networking sessions, and presentations. These events are organized with a mix of in-person and virtual participation to ensure accessibility for a broader audience. The inclusion of policymakers, researchers, and stakeholders from civil society allows for multi-dimensional dialogue on issues such as climate change, urban development, and social innovation.

For this event, an innovative dialogue event was held, where a combination of physical and virtual formats allowed for maximum participation from stakeholders. Researchers from the University of Granada and other partner universities participated by showcasing their work in thematic workshops. The event included a series of discussions, policy briefs, and presentations, as well as the important inclusion of local policymakers through the Impronta Granada platform, which bridges the gap between the academic community and decision-makers.

 

Available Resources (Main Tasks)

  • Securing venues in capital cities for large-scale meetings.
  • Coordinating with stakeholders from local and regional governments, universities, and research institutes.
  • Using online platforms such as Impronta Granada to promote dialogue and share research outcomes with a wider audience.

 

What Works? What Doesn’t? (Lessons Learnt)

What works:

The hybrid event format (in-person + online) allowed for wide participation and dynamic interaction. Micropresentations were particularly successful in translating research data into actionable policy recommendations.

What doesn’t work:

Sustaining momentum after the event remains challenging, particularly in ensuring long-term involvement from policymakers who face competing priorities. Additionally, ensuring equal participation across all sectors, especially among local businesses, can be difficult in regions with fewer resources.

How Do You Evaluate the Activities:

To evaluate the effectiveness of the dialogue events, surveys were distributed to all participants to assess their satisfaction with the format, content, and overall engagement. Key indicators such as the number of new collaborations formed, and the implementation of research insights into local policies, were also tracked to assess long-term impact.

 

Do you want to know more about the policy engagement toolkit?

Do you want to share your experience in policy engagement? Do you think about contributing to the policy engagement toolkit? Feel free to contact Tome Sandevski via science-policy@pvw.uni-frankfurt.de

UGR County Councils: A regional Science-Policy Dialogue Model for Sustainable Development

Summary: Key features in a nutshell

  • Ten regional UGR County Councils, one per county of the Granada province
  • Living Lab and Quadruple Helix approach linking universities, governments, businesses, and citizens
  • Participatory identification of local challenges in water management, soil restoration, sustainable mobility, and cultural heritage
  • Science-policy pairing between researchers and public officials for locally relevant solutions
  • Institutional framework ensuring long-term coordination and knowledge transfer between academia and territorial authorities

 

 

Description

The UGR County Councils are a regional model for science-policy dialogue developed by the University of Granada (Spain) within the Erasmus+ ENGAGEgreen project. The initiative is a response to the province’s urgent environmental and social challenges—such as drought, soil degradation, and rural depopulation—by creating ten County Councils, one per county, that connect academia, policymakers, the private sector, and civil society.

Using the Living Lab methodology and the Quadruple Helix model, the Councils foster collaborative experimentation and evidence-based policymaking. They serve as locally rooted platforms for co-creation, capacity building, and participatory governance, advancing sustainable development at the regional level.

 

How does the format work?

1. Introduction

Granada’s pressing environmental issues revealed a lack of structured mechanisms to integrate scientific evidence into policymaking. To overcome this, the UGR established ten County Councils to institutionalize dialogue between science and policy at the territorial level.

2. Objectives

  • Foster inclusive and structured dialogue between academia, public administration, civil society, and the private sector.
  • Identify and prioritize local challenges through participatory platforms.
  • Pilot a scalable model of science-policy pairing capable of replication in other European regions.
  • Strengthen institutional capacities for knowledge transfer and consolidate the university’s civic engagement mission.

3. Methodology

The Councils employ a Living Lab approach that promotes real-world experimentation and stakeholder cocreation of locally relevant solutions.

They integrate the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix logic, ensuring the participation of:

  • Academic institutions
  • Public administrations
  • Private sector actors
  • Civil-society organizations

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recruitment and participation combined institutional communication (emails, websites) with informal word-of-mouth channels to reach local policymakers and citizens.

Activities used hybrid formats (online and in-person) such as webinars, cocreation workshops, and capacity-building sessions designed to foster dialogue, mutual learning, and joint decision making.

4. Pilot implementation highlights

The UGR County Councils were formally launched in January 2025 during the First Impronta Granada Meeting, which gathered 143 participants for the first province-wide encounter. Since then, the initiative has evolved into a structured network of approximately 230 active participants across ten counties in Granada.

The councils have facilitated science policy dialogue on key environmental issues, including webinars and seminars on soil restoration, drought management, and biotechnological alternatives for pest control, co-organized with local authorities and scientific experts.

Stakeholder engagement reflects the project’s Quadruple Helix foundation, combining public administrations, academic institutions, civil society, and private sector actors.

A total of over 15 multiformat activities have been organized, including:

  • Webinars on soil restoration and drought with regional agencies
  • A seminar on sustainable pest control co-led by UGR biotechnology experts and local mayors
  • Capacity-building workshops and collaborative working sessions, generating more than eight localized action proposals, several of which are being integrated into municipal and regional policy agendas
  • Codesigned, place-based solutions addressing water governance, ecological transition, and rural innovation rooted in territorial realities.
  • Science-policy pairing mechanisms, enabling researchers to act as regional mediators and catalyze evidence-based decision making at the municipal level.

 5. Results and impact

  • National and international visibility through participation in conferences, dissemination via institutional networks, and continuous media outreach
  • Development of a flexible governance model, balancing central coordination with local autonomy and self-organization
  • Institutional recognition and symbolic incentives, such as participation certificates and the forthcoming Best UGR County Council Award, reinforcing long-term stakeholder engagement
  • Hybrid participation formats (online and in-person) expanded accessibility, especially in rural areas, strengthening inclusivity and plural representation

Overall, the UGR County Councils have demonstrated the potential of universities as regional mediators, fostering collaborative solutions that address environmental and social challenges through sustained science-policy dialogue.

 

Challenges

  • Historically weak links between academia and local governments required trust-building
  • Balancing academic coordination with local autonomy
  • Ensuring equitable representation of all quadruple-helix sectors
  • Managing logistics and accessibility for rural territories
  • Translating dialogue outcomes into concrete, actionable policies
  • Difficulties maintaining consistent participation across all counties

 

Tasks and resources

Scientists

  • Contribute research insights on sustainability, soil, water, and cultural heritage
  • Act as regional mediators, facilitating evidence-based discussions
  • Support monitoring and evaluation through data analysis and policy translation

Knowledge exchange managers and research managers

  • Coordinate the creation of ten county-based councils and manage logistics
  • Design and facilitate cocreation workshops and training sessions
  • Ensure alignment between local priorities and ENGAGEgreen objectives
  • Compile reports and communication materials for dissemination (websites, media)

Policymakers

  • Participate in workshops and webinars to share challenges and priorities
  • Provide local data, administrative context, and feedback on proposed solutions
  • Integrate cocreated proposals into municipal or county policy agendas

 

Examples

  • Launch event (January 2025): First Impronta Granada Meeting was attended by 143 participants, marking the establishment of all ten UGR County Councils
  • Ongoing network: Approximately 230 active participants across the province
  • Thematic webinars: On soil restoration, drought management, and biotechnological pest control, co-organized with local authorities and researchers
  • Workshops: Generated over 10 localized action proposals, several now under implementation in municipal policies
  • Hybrid formats: Online and in-person participation strengthened inclusivity and accessibility for rural communities

 

Do you want to know more about the policy engagement toolkit?

Do you want to share your experience in policy engagement? Do you think about contributing to the policy engagement toolkit? Feel free to contact Tome Sandevski via science-policy@pvw.uni-frankfurt.de

How to involve and interact with various stakeholders

How to involve and interact with various stakeholders including policymakers, academic researchers, local businesses, and community representatives

 

Description

Successfully involving and interacting with a broad range of stakeholders is crucial for ensuring that local development projects are comprehensive, inclusive, and sustainable.

Stakeholder engagement is not a one-off activity but a continuous process that requires clear communication, transparent decision-making, and ongoing collaboration between academia, policymakers, businesses, and civil society. Understanding the roles and expectations of each stakeholder group is fundamental to creating a cooperative environment in which all voices are heard and valued.

This contribution explores methods and best practices for engaging stakeholders and facilitating their active participation in territorial development initiatives. Furthermore, it addresses strategies for managing conflicting interests that may arise among stakeholders in collaborative territorial projects.

 

Summary: Key Features in a Nutshell

  • Objective: To create a framework for engaging stakeholders in territorial development projects by facilitating cooperation and mutual understanding across different sectors.
  • Approach: A multi-phase strategy involving stakeholder identification, consultation, collaboration, and continuous feedback loops to ensure that every stakeholder remains actively involved throughout the process.
  • Outcome: The creation of inclusive and sustainable solutions that reflect the interests and needs of all relevant stakeholders.

 

How Does the Format Work?

  1. Stakeholder Mapping and Identification: The first step in involving and interacting with stakeholders is to identify who the key stakeholders are and understand their role in the project. This includes policymakers, academic researchers, local businesses, community representatives, and other relevant actors connected to the issue at stake. Stakeholder identification can be carried out through several complementary methods: drawing on the knowledge and networks of the people already involved in the project, conducting internet and website searches, reviewing institutional documents and previous initiatives, consulting directories and public databases, asking affected groups and community organisations directly, and using snowball techniques in which initial contacts suggest additional relevant actors. Workshops, interviews, surveys, and participatory mapping exercises can also help to broaden and validate the stakeholder map. This process allows project leaders to determine who is affected by the project, who has relevant expertise, who holds decision-making power, and who can contribute resources, legitimacy, or implementation capacity to support the project’s success.
  2. Consultation and Needs Assessment: Once stakeholders are identified, the next step is to engage them in the decision-making process through consultation. This can be done through surveys, focus groups, community meetings, or online consultations. The goal is to gather insights into their needs, expectations, and concerns. For example, in a territorial development project, policymakers might be interested in economic growth, while local communities might prioritize sustainability and preservation of cultural heritage.
  3. Co-Creation and Collaborative Workshops: After gathering input from stakeholders, the next step is to move from consultation to co-creation. This is where stakeholders come together in collaborative workshops to design solutions. These workshops should be structured in a way that allows for inclusive participation and ensures that each stakeholder group has the opportunity to share their perspectives. For example, UGR researchers might provide scientific evidence and policy analysis, while local businesses might share their knowledge of the regional economy and market trends.
  4. Managing Conflicting Interests: In any collaborative territorial project, stakeholders may have conflicting interests, especially when the goals of local governments, academic researchers, and businesses differ. Managing these conflicts is crucial for maintaining productive relationships.

 

Strategies for managing conflicting interests include:

  • Open communication and transparency about each stakeholder’s objectives and constraints.
  • Compromise and negotiation, where stakeholders find common ground or agree to trade-offs that balance their interests.
  • Third-party facilitation to mediate disputes and provide neutral perspectives that encourage cooperation.
  • Building trust by involving all stakeholders in the decision-making process, ensuring that everyone feels their voice is valued and that they are contributing to the shared vision.
  1. Continuous Feedback and Adaptation: Stakeholder engagement does not end after the initial consultation or workshop. It is important to create feedback loops and ongoing communication channels to ensure that stakeholders remain involved throughout the project. This can include regular updates, surveys to gauge satisfaction, and public meetings to review progress. Feedback helps identify potential issues early on and allows for adjustments to be made to keep the project aligned with stakeholder expectations.
  2. Digital Platforms for Ongoing Interaction: One of the most effective ways to involve and interact with stakeholders is through digital platforms. Tools like the Impronta Granada website allow stakeholders to access information about ongoing projects, provide feedback, and connect with other participants. Platforms like these are crucial for maintaining engagement, especially in geographically dispersed areas where face-to-face meetings may be impractical.

 

Challenges

  • Diverse Interests: Involving diverse stakeholders means dealing with different interests and priorities. Balancing these can be difficult, especially when stakeholders have conflicting objectives or limited resources. Managing these differences requires strong communication and the ability to find common ground.
  • Sustaining Engagement: While initial engagement is often high, sustaining long-term involvement from stakeholders —particularly those with other competing priorities (e.g., researchers with heavy academic workloads or policymakers facing budget constraints)— can be challenging.
  • Communication Barriers: Ensuring that communication remains clear and effective across all stakeholder groups is key to preventing misunderstandings. Language differences, technical jargon, or varying levels of engagement can create barriers to effective collaboration.

 

Tasks and Resources

Scientists

  • Tasks:
    • Provide research data and scientific analysis to inform the decision-making process.
    • Participate in collaborative workshops and consultations to share knowledge and develop solutions.
  • Required Resources:
    • Time for fieldwork and data dissemination.
    • Communication tools to share research findings and connect with other stakeholders.

Knowledge Exchange Managers and Research Managers:

  • Tasks:
    • Facilitate stakeholder engagement by organizing workshops and consultations.
    • Ensure that knowledge exchange is effective and that the views of all stakeholders are represented in the project design.
  • Required Resources:
    • Digital platforms for ongoing interaction and data collection (e.g., websites, survey tools, communication channels).

Policymakers

  • Tasks:
    • Provide policy frameworks and resources to support collaborative projects.
    • Ensure that the solutions developed through stakeholder engagement align with local governance priorities.
  • Required Resources:
    • Policy expertise to facilitate discussions and create alignment between stakeholders.
    • Budget and funding for project implementation and follow-up activities.

 

Examples

UGR County Councils refers to the initiative led by the University of Granada (UGR) under the Erasmus+ ENGAGEgreen project, aiming to foster collaboration between academic researchers, local governments, and community stakeholders. This initiative focuses on addressing territorial challenges through co-created, research-driven solutions. The Second Impronta Granada Meeting is the third pilot event organized by UGR as part of this project, bringing together researchers, policymakers, and local communities to discuss and develop strategies for sustainable development in rural and urban areas.

  1. Second Impronta Granada Meeting and UGR County Councils: UGR County Councils successfully involved multiple stakeholders by creating multi-stakeholder platforms where researchers, local governments, and civil society could collaborate. The online preparatory meetings and subsequent interactive workshops that took place at the Second Impronta Granada Meeting ensured that researchers could present their work and directly engage with local needs, while policymakers provided real-world context for academic research.
  2. Impronta Granada Website: The Impronta Granada website provided an accessible platform for stakeholder interaction. Actor profiles and UGR project entries were featured, allowing researchers to connect with policymakers, businesses, and local communities. The website also served as a tool for feedback and continuing engagement, ensuring that local stakeholders remained informed and involved in the projects.

 

Sources and Further Reading

Methods: How to Implement Participatory Approaches

Summary: Key features in a nutshell

  • Objective: To implement participatory methods that ensure broad community involvement in the decision-making process regarding local development
  • Approach: Combining online consultations, interactive workshops, and collaborative projects where diverse stakeholders come together to identify challenges and co-design solutions
  • Outcome: A democratic process where solutions reflect the needs and contributions of all stakeholders, creating ownership and ensuring sustainability in the implementation phase


Description

Implementing participatory approaches requires engaging diverse stakeholders – local communities, researchers, policymakers, citizenship, and businesses – to co-create solutions that address regional challenges. Effective participatory methods empower communities to play an active role in shaping local development strategies, ensuring that solutions are not only scientifically informed but also locally relevant and sustainable.

UGR County Councils refers to the initiative led by the University of Granada (UGR) under the Erasmus + ENGAGEgreen project which aims to foster collaboration between academic researchers, local governments, and community stakeholders. This initiative focuses on addressing regional challenges through co-created, research-driven solutions and exemplifies a successful model for participatory governance in the context of territorial development.

 

How does the format work?

  • Stakeholder Identification. The participatory approach begins with the identification and mapping of relevant stakeholders, a process coordinated by Medialab UGR within the framework of the Impronta initiative. This mapping includes not only governmental actors and researchers but also civil society organisations, local businesses, and community members who hold valuable knowledge about local challenges.
  • Data Collection and Consultation. Online surveys, focus groups, and interactive workshops are used to collect input from these stakeholders. UGR County Councils, for instance, used online preparatory meetings to gather insights from stakeholders, prior to the in-person Second Impronta Granada meeting and its interactive workshops. This method ensures that diverse voices are heard from the outset.
  • Co-Creation and Collaborative Planning. Once needs are identified, co-creation workshops are organised by Medialab UGR within the framework of the Impronta initiative, bringing together researchers, policymakers, civil society, and local businesses to collaboratively develop action plans. These workshops are conducted in real time, allowing for immediate feedback and adaptation. This approach was implemented In the Second Impronta Granada Meeting through the organisation of micropresentations, coordinated by Medialab UGR, where researchers showcased their projects and received direct input from local stakeholders.
  • Public Visibility and Ongoing Engagement. Digital platforms such as the Impronta Granada website help maintain visibility and engagement. Research projects, community initiatives, and stakeholder profiles are made publicly available, allowing all participants to track progress and contribute to the discussion. Actor profiles and UGR project entries are key tools in ensuring continuous participation and keeping the community engaged.

 

Challenges

  • Coordination and Communication. In complex multi-stakeholder projects, ensuring clear communication between actors can be challenging. The UGR County Councils initiative highlights the need for dedicated facilitation to coordinate between different sectors and ensure that all voices are heard.
  • While initial participation can be strong, maintaining engagement over time is a common challenge. Researchers, policymakers, and community leaders need to be committed to continuous collaboration beyond the initial workshops or meetings.

 

Tasks and resources

Scientists

  • Tasks
    • Provide research findings that inform the participatory process
    • Facilitate workshops and co-creation activities
  • Required resources
    • Research dissemination tools, such as databases, interactive websites, and community-based data collection tools.

Knowledge exchange managers and research managers

  • Tasks
    • Coordinate stakeholder engagement
    • Manage the organisation of online and in-person consultations
    • Ensure that feedback is effectively incorporated into the development process
  • Required resources
    • Communication tools (e.g., websites, social media platforms); workshop materials (e.g., visual aids, data collection tools).

Policymakers

  • Tasks
    • Create policy frameworks that reflect the inputs from the participatory process
    • Allocate resources for implementation
    • Ensure continuous engagement with community leaders
  • Required resources
    • Policy expertise and financial resources to support the implementation of the co-created solutions.

 

Examples

ENGAGEgreen Project and UGR County Councils

The Erasmus + ENGAGEgreen project and the UGR County Councils initiative highlight how participatory approaches can effectively connect academic research with local governance. As part of this approach, several preparatory activities were carried out, including the first Impronta Granada Meeting in January 2025, followed by the UGR County Councils meeting in July 2025, and the second Impronta Granada Meeting in December 2025, where researchers, local policymakers, businesses, and civil society actors came together to identify and address regional challenges such as sustainable tourism, heritage preservation, and economic development. These meetings helped align UGR research with the needs of the Poniente Granadino and other regions by actively involving researchers in discussions about local priorities. During these events, UGR researchers presented their ongoing projects, with some projects being mapped through an Excel database that catalogued research topics, researcher affiliations, and their relevant county councils. This process also helped to integrate research findings into the local policy discussions, encouraging collaboration between academia and local actors. Additionally, the Impronta Granada website was crucial in ensuring visibility for these UGR researchers, as it included actor profiles and project listings, categorised by UGR County Councils, which allowed stakeholders to filter and connect with relevant research in their regions. The use of online workshops and micropresentations allowed for continuous engagement and co-creation of solutions, making sure that academic knowledge was aligned with local development goals and integrated into long-term strategies.

 

Sources and further reading

 

Do you want to know more about the policy engagement toolkit?

Do you want to share your experience in policy engagement? Do you think about contributing to the policy engagement toolkit? Feel free to contact Tome Sandevski via science-policy@pvw.uni-frankfurt.de

Other